<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=1054151198438221&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">
Skip to content
Thursday, March 19th at 2pm EST

Give Claude, ChatGPT & Copilot Access to Real Research with Scite MCP

How Full-Text Search, Smart Citations & Access Resolution Change What AI Can Do for Researchers

Register

💻 Live on Zoom

🗓️ Thursday, March 19th at 2 pm EST

There's a version of AI-assisted research that doesn't break under scrutiny. This live webinar shows you what it looks like, and how to set it up in two minutes.

When Claude or ChatGPT answers a research question, the citations it returns are predictions, not retrievals. Statistically probable outputs based on training data patterns. Most of the time they look fine. Sometimes a DOI leads nowhere. More often, a real paper gets cited to support a claim it doesn't actually make, and that kind of failure is subtle enough to survive early review. The speed gains AI promises disappear the moment you have to manually verify every reference it hands you.

Scite MCP changes the equation. Connect your Scite account to Claude, ChatGPT, or Copilot, and your AI responses come back grounded in over 1.6 billion Smart Citations, each one classified as supporting, contrasting, or mentioning the finding it references. Not summaries. Not abstracts. Full-text search across the actual literature, with access resolution that surfaces the real paper behind the real DOI.

You'll walk away knowing:

  • Why native AI citations fail in ways that are obvious and ways that aren't, and why the subtle failures are the ones that cost you
  • What Smart Citations actually classify, and why the supporting/contrasting/mentioning distinction is the signal your AI tool is currently missing
  • How to connect Scite to Claude, ChatGPT, and Copilot live, in under two minutes
  • What full-text search access actually changes about what your AI can find and verify
  • What's available now through the MCP, and what's coming next

Who should attend:

This session is for anyone whose work depends on getting the evidence right: researchers and scientists already using AI to survey literature or draft summaries who want outputs they can actually stand behind; faculty navigating AI in their own workflows or fielding questions from students who are; librarians and research support professionals guiding their communities toward responsible AI use without asking people to abandon the tools they've already adopted; and R&D or research operations leads at organizations where citation quality is a due diligence issue, not just an academic one.

If your daily work touches the question of whether a finding is real, well-supported, and accurately attributed, this is for you.

Register Now